Vehicle Dynamics International
  • News
    • Braking
    • Chassis
    • Driveline & Transmission
    • Dynamics Software
    • Electronic Dynamic Control
    • Lightweighting
    • OEM News
    • Ride Comfort
    • Simulation
    • Steering
    • Tires and wheels
    • Vehicle Testing
  • Features
  • Online Magazines
    • December 2024
    • May 2023
    • December 2023
    • May 2023
    • November 2022
    • Spring 2022
    • Subscribe Free!
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
  • Events
  • VDI Awards
    • 2022 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2021 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2020 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2019 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2018 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2017 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
LinkedIn YouTube X (Twitter)
Subscribe to Magazine SUBSCRIBE TO EMAIL NEWSLETTER MEDIA PACK
LinkedIn
Vehicle Dynamics International
  • News
      • Braking
      • Chassis
      • Driveline & Transmission
      • Dynamics Software
      • Electronic Dynamic Control
      • Lightweighting
      • OEM News
      • Ride Comfort
      • Simulation
      • Steering
      • Tires and wheels
      • Vehicle Testing
  • Features
  • Supplier innovations
  • Online Magazines
    1. December 2024
    2. May 2024
    3. December 2023
    4. May 2023
    5. November 2022
    6. Spring 2022
    7. Subscribe Free!
    Featured
    December 10, 2024

    The December 2024 issue of Vehicle Dynamics International is out!

    Braking By Web Team
    Recent

    The December 2024 issue of Vehicle Dynamics International is out!

    December 10, 2024

    The May 2024 issue of Vehicle Dynamics International is out!

    May 20, 2024

    The December 2023 issue of Vehicle Dynamics International is out!

    December 19, 2023
  • Videos
  • Supplier Spotlight
  • Jobs
    • Browse Jobs
    • Post a Job – It’s FREE!
    • Manage Jobs (Employers)
  • Events
  • VDI Awards
    • 2023 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2022 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2021 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2020 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2019 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2018 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
    • 2017 Vehicle Dynamics International Awards: the winners!
LinkedIn
Vehicle Dynamics International
Features

John Miles: how Percentage Ackermann impacts chassis behaviour

Adam GavineBy Adam GavineNovember 2, 20204 Mins Read
Share LinkedIn Twitter Facebook Email

In this engineering insight piece from VDI’s late technical editor, John Miles takes a look at how Percentage Ackermann impacts chassis behaviour.

Percentage Ackermann describes the degree to which the inner and outer wheels are steering on their respective radii throughout the whole range of the steering motion. For low-speed manoeuvering, the theoretical ideal is 100%, because then each front wheel would be on its respective radius and there would be no “scrubbing” at all between the inner and outer tyres.

With zero Ackermann or parallel steer (Lotus Esprit), the inner and outer wheels are on the same lock angle at all times. As a result you will find that from mid-lock onwards there is increasing protest from the front tyres as the inner tyre is being forced to steer on the same radius as the outer one.

So more Ackermann is better for turning tight corners, but for me the intriguing part is the effect changes in percentage Ackermann can have on high-speed stability. The difference between outer and inner wheel angles at full lock with 60% Ackermann is usually about 4°, say 32° and 36°, respectively, but high-speed car control is achieved with steering wheel angles of no more than 10° or less than 1° at the wheel rim with a typical 16:1 steering ratio.

Whatever the percentage Ackermann, the difference between outer and inner wheel angles at 1° is not measurable by any means I know of, yet the effect on straight line and high-speed cornering stability of small changes in Ackermann can be substantial; the more Ackermann angle you have, the more “pointy” the car becomes at high speed.

My most recent experience of this was on a high-performance RWD car that needed faster steering response. The rack ratio couldn’t be changed, so the steering arms were altered instead, the unavoidable side effect being a reduction in percentage Ackermann from 50% to 30% at full lock, thus closer to parallel steer. With quicker steering I was concerned that there would be a reduction in stability on a car capable of nearly 322km/h (200mph). In fact the car turned out to be significantly more stable at high speeds, and, of course, it had better low-speed response as well – a true win-win modification.

How could this be, when the difference in steered angle between the inner and outer wheels at small lock angles is so infinitely small? Even the “boffins” could give no precise explanation. Some form of logic says that in the case of parallel steer the inner and outer tyres must be trying to run on the same radius, providing a degree of across-axle “scrub”, thus resistance to driver input and the car turning.

There is no such “resistance” to turning with nearer 100% Ackermann because the inner and outer tyres are tracking more or less on their respective radii. Of course none of this takes into account the effects of kinematic and compliance steer, or static toe, which may be modifying the effective dynamic Ackermann present at any given moment.

John Miles evaluated Ackermann for the Lotus Esprit

From the driving seat, the impression is that the “yaw centre” moves forward with more percentage Ackermann, and rearward with less. This can be visualised when looking at the simple top-view Ackermann drawing. Less Ackermann sees the intersection point of the steering arm pivot to steering axes moving further and further behind the rear axle centreline. It is as if the yaw centre of the car follows alterations in this intersection point to provide a longer and longer “virtual” lever arm about which the car pivots.

Years ago non-downforce race car designers favoured “parallel” steer geometries, or even anti-Ackermann, arguing that the more lightly laden inner tyre needed to run at a lower slip angle than the outer tyre to generate optimum cornering force at its lower vertical load. Of course this means the inner tyre will be trying to describe a larger radius than the outer tyre, which logic says is not conducive to the overall cornering performance. Once downforce is introduced, the inner tyre does more work and may need to run at a slip angle closer to that on the outer tyre.

Front-wheel-drive touring cars are a special case. Anecdotal evidence seems to suggest that they perform best with road-car-type Ackermann characteristics. This makes sense when you consider that the inner wheel should not be trying to drive the car forward on a larger arc than the outer wheel.

As with all chassis design, there is still a lot we don’t understand, which is why chassis development is such a challenge. Or as one renowned chassis designer said: “to be honest, choosing Ackermann angles is still guesswork”.

Share. Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Email
Previous ArticleIntroducing the Bugatti Bolide
Next Article Eye-tracking technology incorporated into simulators
Adam Gavine
  • X (Twitter)

Adam divides his time as an editor between the worlds of aviation and motoring. These worlds may seem a little diverse today, but autonomous technology and future urban mobility is bringing them ever-closer. Adam is also chairman of the Vehicle Dynamics International Awards.

Related Posts

Chassis

McLaren adopts Automated Rapid Tape (ART) carbon fibre engineering

March 20, 20255 Mins Read
Features

McLaren’s strength in carbon fibre technology

March 20, 202510 Mins Read
Features

Recalling the Hillman Imp and its engineer, Tim Fry

March 17, 20255 Mins Read
Latest Posts

BWI Group increases MagneRide production as demand for active suspension grows

April 25, 2025

Michelin drives software revenue growth with monetised simulation

April 25, 2025

Tenneco launches low-emission brake technology to meet Euro 7 and China 7

April 25, 2025
Our Social Channels
  • LinkedIn
Getting in Touch
  • Free Email Newsletters
  • Meet The Editors
  • Contact Us
  • Media Pack
Related Topics
  • Electric & Hybrid Vehicle
  • Industrial Vehicle Technology
FREE NEWS EMAIL!

Get essential industry news from this website direct to your inbox every fortnight


© 2023 Mark Allen Group Ltd | All Rights Reserved
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.